"The people who are most bigoted are the people who have no convictions" G. K. Chesterton

______________________________________________

 

 

CORONA HOAX OR HORROR?

OR THE PANDEMIC THAT NEVER WAS?

 

 

Governments had for months sounded in shrillest tones that we were in the grip of a pandemic that in the real world does not and never did exist. Millions of citizens across the world have been thoroughly deceived and deprived of their rights. Decisions were made on the basis of guesswork by mathematicians and statisticians with little or no medical knowledge of any kind and all of whom have made predictions that have proved to have been baseless. Arbitrary decisions rather than evidence-based data have determined policy.

Politicians have quite deliberately instilled fear in the population to enable absolute control. Senseless lockdowns and useless if not harmful mask-wearing has been enforced. The result has been a devastation of an already shaky economy and the livelihoods of many hard-working people has been ruthlessly destroyed. The health service in Britain far from being 'saved' has been disrupted, all but closed down and the lives of many suffering from stokes, cancer and other serious conditions have been unnecessarily lost. Care homes were heartlessly used to warehouse the elderly and vulnerable, many dying as a direct consequence. In all immense suffering is still being inflicted on us. This is an overall an appalling state of affairs for which our governments are fully responsible. It is this horrendous and very serious indictment against government with which we shall now concern ourselves.

Pandemic

When a pandemic was declared immediately talk of a tsunami when countless numbers would lose their lives unless action was taken to ‘flatten the curve’. Suddenly, everyone had an opinion and yet few had any real knowledge of infectious diseases. Projections flooded the news channels; exponential growth was forecast. The infection seemed impossible to stop, doubling each week. Public life came to a standstill. Cinemas, clubs, museums, everything had to shut and even religious services were banned. Hospital appointments were postponed, surgery stopped. To save the NHS the health system was all but mothballed.

The few sane voices were ignored by politicians and their advisers. They preferred the predictions of people like Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College, London. He hit the headlines claiming that if nothing is done and the virus is allowed to spread uncontrolled 500,000 or more would die and at least 2 million in the USA. This stuck fear into the population. Yet his record is a poor one. Ferguson predicted 136,000 deaths due to mad cow disease or BSE, 200 million death due to avian flu and 65,000 death due to swine ‘flu. Thankfully, in the even there were but a few hundred, 121. No one seemed to remember his disastrous record and certainly we were not reminded of them in the media.

Lockdown, go outside surreal, ghostly, streets, deserted. Shops boarded up, some never to reopen. Social life all but gone and the economy accepted as being in a state of inevitable collapse. Students are locked away in their halls of residence, suicides are soaring. Heads must roll at SAGE. What awful threat, what dreadful danger could had precipitated these measures? A global vaccination programme is postured as a cure-all, but is this practicable or even scientifically sound? Either we have all been in grave danger or this is the biggest hoax ever foisted on mankind.

What are Coronaviruses?

Corona viruses are nothing new and have been with us from time immemorable and co-exist with humans and animals undergoing countless genetic mutations. They are the cause of 10-20% of all respiratory infections. Many infected show no symptoms or just something akin to a common cold, a cough, perhaps run a temperature and suffer joint pains. Illness is likely to be severe mainly in those with pre-existing illnesses that affect the heart or the lungs. Even less harmful viruses can reach fatality rate of 8% when invading care homes.

The true threat of the virus is almost impossible to estimate. This difficulty was compounded by the confusing and incorrect information emerging from the World Health Organisation. Every positive laboratory test was to be counted as a COVID -19 case quite apart from lack of any symptoms. This was an unfortunate error because it is essential to distinguish between an infection whereby the agent is simply present and an infectious disease with its ensuing illness. Covid-19 is the name given to the severe illness that occurs in around 10% of infected persons. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus and the two are distinct. However, because of the confusion between these two the number of ‘cases’ surged so that the virus wrongly shot to the top of the existential threats to the world. Not everyone with the virus is a COVID-19 case.

As if this mistake was not enough, every deceased person who had previously tested positive for the virus was recorded as a coronavirus victim. This kind of reporting breached every international medical guideline. Consequently, the absurd situation arose where someone dying of cancer was given the cause of death as COVID-19. In such circumstances it was to be expected that rumours and myths sprang up like mushrooms. The fact is that studies done in France in March showed that respiratory virus-associated deaths among hospital patients was not substantially different in 2019-2020 than in the previous year.

Death rates from SARS-Cov-19 may be difficult to establish, but it is thought that from those actually infected and not just testing positive 0.15 to 0.2% may die, perhaps even lower. Those under 65 almost never die from SARS-Cov-19 alone. The fatality rate in over 80s is higher possibly around 1-2%. In most cases discovery of the virus is by chance and is not actually the primary cause of death. It has been calculated only 10 in 10,000 over 80s have died in the epidemic with or from COVID-19 in one year. Among those around half will have had cardiovascular problems, one third cancer and 10% with respiratory infections. This means that in most European countries 100-150 of per 10,000 over eighties die of respiratory infections each year. This year 10 out of 150 of these deaths only have been associated with COVID-19. Having said that, it is clear that we are not dealing with higher numbers comparable with other pathogens that cause pneumonia. SARS-Cov-19 is no more dangerous than seasonal or moderate flu. Vaccines only make sense where sickness causes a similar death rate across all age groups, as for example with tetanus or diphtheria. Even here serious issues remain unanswered. Mass testing where the death rate is low makes no sense.

Testing for the Virus

The virus or SARS-Cov-2 will remain in the nasopharynx for around two weeks and can be readily detected during this period. The PCR test for the new virus was developed in Berlin under the guidance of Professor Christian Drosten, Head of the Institute for Virology at the Charité. It was used across the world in the initial months of the outbreak. Normally such tests would have been subjected to rigorous testing and be approved by appropriate regulatory bodies, but because of the urgency of the situation these quality control requirements were not carried out. No test gives 100% accurate results. Although test results played an important role in in political decision making, interpretation of the data was largely guesswork. Drosten himself made clear that at the end of the illness particularly, the PCR will sometimes be negative at others positive. A patient may test negative on two occasions and be discharged as cured only to have positive again at home. This does not indicate a reinfection. Test results are error-prone. There are just as likely to be false-positives as false-negatives. In the light of this, PCR testing became a dangerous source of misinformation because new cases were derived from largely false positive results. Mass screening becomes senseless in non-symptomatic individuals when positive test rate drops below a certain limit. We should not tolerate the use of case numbers acquired in this way to justify the implementation of any measures. We know that viruses may change but do not entirely disappear. Every year we have a season of ‘flu in the same way there is season of coronavirus. Any government wanting a second wave only has to radically increase the number of tests while the coronavirus season is in full swing. This manipulation triggers the desired laboratory pandemic.

The use of the PCR test has been criticised across the world by numerous scientists despite claims that it is a quite robust and useful tool. Deputy Medical Officer of Ontario, Dr Barbara Yaffe recently stated that Covid-19 testing may yield 50% false positives, meaning that many who test positive do not have Covid at all. In July, professor Carl Heneghan, director of the centre of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University said the same. Former scientific advisor to Pfizer, Dr Mike Yeadon has argued that the proportion of positive tests that are false could be as high as 90%. Others have rated the test results as being ‘scientifically meaningless’.

The greater the testing capacity and number of tests performed, the more cases will be found instigating a laboratory-created pandemic, which is no pandemic at all. There exists no reliable data with respect to the true numbers of infection at any stage of the epidemic. At its peak numbers were grossly underestimated as it began to wane grossly overestimated. It is the height of recklessness for governments to base any political decisions on official numbers at any stage, particularly in view of the devastating consequences this is having on our communities and country ads a whole.

The whole concept of lockdown is based on testing. However, in order to keep us in lockdown government pretends it is something else. When the lockdown in Liverpool started, the unreliable PCR test was being used. When they moved to the more reliable Rapid Lateral Flow test on the 5th November, cases plummeted by more than 50%. It is convenient for government to use the PCR test to justify their decision to lock people away. The general public is being misled by false data from the PCR tests. There is opportunity for huge contamination in the laboratories. The figures we are getting from government are wholly inaccurate. We must ask, does government know this and are they hiding the truth from us? In Norway every PCR test is double-checked. When they began doing this, case numbers fell dramatically. They have very few Covid cases. Either PCR positive tests should always be double-checked or completely replaced with the Rapid Lateral Flow test.

When we are seeking to establish how many deaths the SARS-CoV-2 infections have claimed, we immediately face the question as to what is a coronavirus death? Should I be caught up in a road accident and die just as my positive test results arrive, I will be counted as a coronavirus death. This is clearly false accounting. Should I jump out of the window in shock and die on learning my tests are positive or suffer a stroke, then sure enough I will be counted as a coronavirus death. One German professor at Hamburg University ventured to perform autopsies on all coronavirus victims and discovered that not a single one had been healthy. Nearly all had suffered from some pre-existing condition. Hypertension, atherosclerosis, obesity, diabetes, cancer, lung and kidney disease and liver cirrhosis are all frequent culprits. The professor found pulmonary embolisms in every third patient. Clots begin in the legs as when older people spend most of the day seated and inactive and then are swept up into the lungs. The best advice to elderly is not, as we hear all around the world “stay at home”.

The opposite is best: as much fresh air and activity you can get so much the better. The presence of pre-existing conditions caused Professor Walter Riccardi, an adviser to the Italian Ministry of Health, to claim in an interview that 88% of the country’s coronavirus deaths had not been caused by the virus. Official coronavirus death counts are nothing other than misleading overestimates. Some deaths have been counted on mere suspicion. Once tested an individual is likely to remain a victim for life, irrespective of when or how death occurs, he or she has been entered on a register and on the death certificate COVID-19 will be entered as the cause. No or little distinction is being made between ‘death by’ and ‘death with’ coronavirus. This misleading way of reporting coronavirus deaths spreads fear and panic among the population so that they are willing to accept the outrageous and irrational measures imposed by governments. Serious consequences for public health was a direct result, a record number of deaths in a single week more than average for the time of year and only half of which could possibly have been attributed to coronavirus.

Four German holiday makers were illegally quarantined in Portugal. The tourists were ordered to stay imprisoned in their hotel over the summer. Judges upheld the verdict of a lower court that the forced detention of the tourists was unlawful. The case centred on the reliability or otherwise of the PCR test. The conclusion of the judges included this in their 34 page ruling: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus”. There are too many unknows about PCR testing. Three US States have agreed that when the amount of the virus found in the person tested is taken into account 90% of those tested could actually be negative due to the tiny amounts present. The mainstream media have ignored this case only the alternative media have picked it up. Finland has rigorously disputed the WHOs recommendation that as many people as possible should be tested. Many poorer South East Asian countries are holding off on the purchase of vaccines. Having been caught out before, they have no intention of wasting tax-payers’ money again.
PCR testing is responsible for creating havoc around the word. The ‘R number’ or rate at which a carrier is said to infect others is calculated from these extremely doubtful tests. England’s senseless tiered restrictions are achieved in this way. As time goes on evidence that this was a huge deception will surface, but by then the lives and livelihoods of so many will have been destroyed.

According to the Department of Health and Social Care over 1,300 people in Britain were inaccurately informed that they were infected with coronavirus after a laboratory error at the government’s NHS Test and Trace system. “Swift action was taken to notify those affected and they have been asked to take another test, and to continue to self-isolate if they have symptoms.” The NHS Test and Trace system has been a catastrophe of immense proportions. Instead of scrapping the idea, what does the government do? It throws another £7 billion at and expanded programme of mass testing that is bound to fail. In September 16,000 positive case records were lost from the system for several days causing a delay in contact tracing.

Just another form of ‘flu?

WHO shouted loudly and clearly at the outset that the COVID-19 virus was very much more infectious than normal ‘flu and that there exists no known vaccination or medication with which to treat it. What they failed to mention was that no effective medicine for any form of ‘flu exists and vaccines are widely recognised as being ineffective or even counterproductive. Seeing the number of true Covid-19 deaths is considerably lower than we are led to believe, the conclusion of many investigators has been that this is really not a killer virus and fatalities are comparable to any seasonal ‘flu. Age is not necessarily a decisive factor. The extent to which the virus is deadly depends very much on an individual’s general state of health. SARS-CoV-2 is generally the final push over the edge. Millions die every year of respiratory tract infections with a whole range of bacterial and viral agents playing a role.

COVID-19 is a quite nasty disease that causes sickness in some people, is fatal to a few and leaves everyone else untouched. Much like any other ‘flu, if you have it you stay at home and keep away from grandma and grandad. This is only what we have always done. The fear that asymptomatic people can pass on the deadly virus to other has been shown to be false. Yet this has been the driving force behind many extreme preventative measures such as cruel visiting bans and mandatory mask-wearing. There is equally no reason to believe that children play a significant role as vectors for the transmission of the virus so that measures such as closing schools.

Desperate scenes from hospitals dramatically portrayed in the media, along with model calculations involving hundreds of thousands even millions of deaths have all contributed to filling the population with fear: COVID-19 has got to be a killer! It was Hannah Arendt, looking closely at totalitarianism who stated that if you scare the population, you can do anything with it.

Comparisons abound with Spanish ‘flu that broke out at the end of the First World War. It was secondary bacterial infections that were the main cause of death at a time when antibiotics were not available for treatment. People of all ages perished. Anyone comparing Covid-19 and Spanish ‘flu is ignorant or deliberately using it to scare people.

Reproduction factor R

Warning followed warning. Governments embarked on an unparalleled crusade of fear-mongering. To challenge the warning that our world faced the greatest pandemic of all times meant all kinds of defamation and censorship. The range of measures deemed necessary were introduced or withdrawn in a haphazard way. At first it was the doubling of the rate of infections exceeding 10 days, when this was reached the goalposts were moved the rate had to be slowed to 14 days. This was soon reached and a new criterion needed to be found: the reproduction factor ‘R’ fitted admirably. The ‘R’ factor indicated how many people became infected by one contagious person. Authorities decided this number must be decreased to less than 1. This inevitably ran into difficulties. An upper limit was soon agreed upon: 35 per 100,000. There was no scientific data underlying any of these measures. Puzzling was that the daily R-factor fluctuated erratically. What most do not realise is that when the infections are low the R-factor can be manipulated simply by altering the number of tests conducted.

National Lockdowns

Orders to stay at home nationwide were given the euphemistic less negative title of ‘lockdown’. The population was in reality imprisoned in their homes. Leaving home required a valid reason. These political decisions were made without any scientific evidence to justify them. Anyone dissenting was ignored, discredited, vilified in the media. Two things are glaringly evident: the epidemic reached its peak well before any lockdown was introduced; the lockdowns have no effect as numbers did not drop after their introduction. 50,000 doctors and scientists signed a declaration strongly opposing the lockdown measures claiming that more than 100 million people will be pushed to starvation as a result of global lockdowns. Lockdowns in the UK alone may well have killed more seniors than Covid itself.
The British parliament’s government by decree, the introduction of the Coronavirus Act 2020, all ride rough-shod over the Magna Carta (1215) and the Bill of Rights (1689). Our human dignity, not to mention our historic freedoms, have not simply been ignored but deliberately trampled underfoot.

A study published on July 21st in The Lancet indicated that government lockdowns were ineffective. Researchers collected data from the 50 countries with the most cases and found lockdowns were not associated with mortality reductions in critical COVID-19 cases, although factors such as obesity, smoking, and life expectancy were. “…government actions such as border closures, full lockdowns, and a high rate of COVID-19 testing were not associated with statistically significant reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality,” the study concluded.

Nevertheless, Western governments have been continually chanting in chorus that these measures are needed to protect the health services, save the NHS. So-called ‘Nightingale’ hospitals were erected in England all over the place for an influx of Covid victims that never materialised. Praised as a wonderful achievement, our government spent £569m on 20,900 ventilators of which most to this day remain in the boxes in which they were delivered. The forecast giant ‘wave’ of victims never happened largely because everything was all over before these measures were put in place. Hospitals postponed, suspended all elective procedures such as hip or knee operations and check-ups for cancer patients. To the present, patients are only reluctantly seen in the most urgent circumstances. Doctors and other staff were put on short-time working hours whilst hospitals were experiences as much as 30% occupancy reductions. The NHS was ‘saved’ by shutting it down.
Those looking seriously at the collateral damage caused by the unwarranted measures, particularly good ones containing meticulous analysis, and on this basis judging the measures excessive have been and will be refused, scorned, defamed and even suspended if in government service. Our corrupt media will also play its part. This rather suggests something other than protecting our health is here involved. It would seem both Germany’s Merkel and Britain’s Johnson decided long ago, “The pandemic has just begun!” Under no circumstances must the public gain the impression the pandemic is over. Too much liberty is dangerous. What on earth is going on?

Mandatory masks

One of the most amazing even frightening aspects of the current Covid crisis has been the speed at which the population has donned face masks. It testifies to the fear that has been instilled, but also the blind gullibility towards the proclamations of the media and government despite there being a complete lack of any clear evidence that people who are not ill or providing care to someone who is should wear a mask to reduce the transmission of influenza or Covid-19. No self-respecting scientist can deny that: there is no evidence that symptom-free people spread the disease; masks do not and cannot protect from infection; non-medical masks have an almost non-existent filter efficiency; even cotton surgical masks can have as much as 97% risk of penetration of microorganisms; moisture retention and reuse of cloth masks may result in increased risk of infection.

Most people, especially the elderly, believe they are safe while wearing them. This completely untrue as wearing a mask can bring with it serious health hazards, especially for those with pulmonary disease and cardiac insufficiency, those with anxiety and panic disorders and then children. The WHO stated at the start that wearing masks had no purpose. Wearing a mask has but one purpose: to instil and keep fear alive in the population. It is a badge of humiliation.

Ventilators

There was a cry at the beginning about a possible shortage of ventilators. Despite the fact that ventilators should be only when absolutely necessary and then only for a short period, they were used as the first-line of defence from a death by suffocation. Governments purchased them by the thousand. Use of a ventilator needs serious and constant monitoring. Oxygen is forced through a tube into the lungs. One problem is that bacteria will also get into the lungs bringing life-threatening pneumonia. So many Covid-19 sufferers were kept on a ventilator for far longer than is usual or wise. Yet this was official policy and there is no way of knowing how many died as a direct result of this. On the other hand, patients who received oxygen with simple respiratory mask had a far better chance of survival. Many who survive prolonged treatment in intensive care with a ventilator frequently high numbers of them are never able to return to their former lives, some are left seriously disabled.

Collateral Damage

It has become very clear that SARS-CoV-2 is not a killer virus and the exponential increase in new infections just did not happen. Yet we have paid an appalling and disproportionate price in an attempt to contain a danger that never existed. Governments have inflicted unspeakable suffering on us by proclaiming an epidemic that did not exist, deliberately spreading fear. They have deprived us of our rights with no good reason. Decisions have been arbitrary not evidence-based, such as senseless lockdown and mask-wearing. Their actions a devastated our economy, destroyed livelihoods, cost lives and disrupted health care not saved it. Domestic violence increased as did the number of suicides. How can our politicians live with themselves? They must have hearts of stone.

We need to reflect as to whether the fight against coronavirus is worse than the disease itself. Although the disease as a whole is a mild one, we have generated a host of irrational fears. There is no reason whatever for the wholesale testing called for by governments. If there is to be any testing, it should surely be done only where appropriate such as in hospitals and care homes.

We face an economic crisis of global proportions. It is likely to plunge 500 million people into poverty according to the UN. The EU commission predicts a deep recession of historical proportions, shrinking a good 7% from which recovery will be prolonged. Government safety nets and rescue packages are pathetic in view of the damage that has been done. Countless people are falling through the net, lives and businesses have been lost that cannot be salvaged by safety nets. And what for, a manufactured fake epidemic existing largely only in testing laboratories.

Medical care

There have been many who were ill and in genuine need but who have been scared off visiting a hospital for fear of catching the ‘killer virus’. Patients needing consultations, check-ups or medical examinations were not deemed urgent enough to be seen and so the appointments were cancelled or postponed. Operations were put back or cancelled to make room for an expected flood of coronavirus patients.

Unemployment increases the risk of a heart attack to the same extent as does cigarette smoking, diabetes or hypertension. Admissions to emergency care units dropped 30%. This was not because of miracle cures but simply that patients were scared of catching the deadly virus on a hospital visit, some being warned off by hospital staff. Early symptoms harbinger of a deadly heart attack may be missed when in fact they need closely watching. Often as many as 50% less patients are attending the hospitals with mild stroke symptoms such as dizziness, speech or visual problems. This is serious and can turn rapidly to being fatal if left unattended.

One thing is certain the immeasurable grief caused by these untoward measures is almost impossible to quantify.

Sweden and other countries

In contrast to almost every other country, Sweden decided that lockdowns were pointless and dangerous. The closing of schools has never worked and has no scientific basis. As was to be expected the media in other countries took every opportunity to badmouth their valiant efforts. The reality is that the epidemic took a similar course to that in other countries, yet the dissemination of fake news grew in order to put the country off its decided pathway. When reluctantly it was admitted that some success had attended the approach taken in Sweden and Iceland, where almost all of the 1800 victims recovered, this was attributed to low population density. Forgotten was the fact that densely populated Japan and South Korea where life carried on much as normal, restaurants remained open in Japan and the predicted disaster did not happen. Japan had few infections, possibly because there was little testing. South Korea did test more than any other country but the disruption to normal life was largely avoided. All these countries have shown, even with their different approaches, that lockdowns achieve nothing and may make matters considerably worse over the long term. The massive economic and social damage done cannot be justified.

At the end of 2019 the WHO, whilst recommending lockdowns, failed to give any scientific basis for the statement. There were those who objected. Nobel laureate Professor Michael Levitt called lockdowns a ‘gigantic mistake’. Most countries follow the WHO guidance. It is now almost impossible to arrive at realistic numbers of deaths from the virus because of the dishonesty in recording and the refusal to distinguish deaths from or with the virus.

Vaccination

It is clear a huge vaccination programme has been planned. We can only speculate as to the reasons for this. At the time of writing the EU has ordered 250 million doses. The UK has ordered 100m doses of the Covid vaccine being produced by the University of Oxford and Astra Zeneca vaccine. In all the British government has placed orders for 350 million of six different coronavirus vaccines. It is less important whether we are for or against vaccine than whether they actually ‘work’ and what does this actually mean. Wild claims from manufacturers that are 95% effective need to be received with extreme caution.

The cry has long been that there can be no return to normality until a vaccine is available. The pandemic will end when a vaccine is available. Italy has an officially imposed vaccination programme for the entire population. Despite this suspicion abound that vaccination against various pathogens such as ‘flu, meningococci and pneumococci can make Covid-19 much worse.

Many vaccines are less dangerous than useless for most people, but some can be positively harmful. There is plenty of well-documented research around that substantiates this assertion. Three quotations will suffice:

“While 70-80% of British children were immunized against pertussis (whooping cough) in 1970-71, the rate is now 39%. The committee predicts that the next pertussis epidemic will probably turn out to be more severe than the one in 1974/75. However, they do not explain why, in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities.” Wolfgang Ehrengut in The Lancet, February 1978

“… Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored.” The Lancet, May, 1983

“Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children.” Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 58.

To return to Covid-19, Dr. Mike Yeadon PhD, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory Disease: “There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic… You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “What we know about coronavirus from 30 years of experience is that a coronavirus vaccine has a unique peculiarity, which is any attempt at making the vaccine has resulted in the creation of a class of antibodies that actually make vaccinated people sicker when they ultimately suffer exposure to the wild virus.” 

The coronavirus binds via spikes, protein projections, that recognise specific molecules, receptors, on our cell. After multiplying, viral progenies are released that infect other cells. Read medical text books and they will invariably say that immunity against coronavirus rests on two things: first, antibodies; second, cells in our immune system called helper and killer lymphocytes. When a virus enters the body for the first time and causes illness the body mobilises these lines of defence. Both will recognise the invader and remember it long-term. Should the virus return, bolstered by their previous encounter, these lines of defence will be summoned to the fight. Classic viral vaccines are designed to make our immune system produce such antibodies. It is thought that an individual will then become immune to the virus.
If someone is tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and nothing is found this still does not mean they are not infected. Severe symptoms may produce high volumes of antibodies, mild symptoms low antibody levels. Asymptomatic infections most likely occur with no antibody production. Even when antibodies are found this does not mean you are immune. At present immunological tests cannot selectively detect protective antibodies without other antibodies showing up at the same time. Testing cannot give any reliable information on the immune status of an individual and is essentially useless.

Even when a vaccination is successful and a production of protective antibodies has taken place, this does not guarantee immunity. Even worse, antibody production will decline after just a few short months. Protection should it be achieved at all is transient. There is no scientific evidence whatsoever for person immune status.

After the virus enters the cell the lymphocytes arrive on the scene. Helper cells burst into action activating the killer lymphocytes and kill the cells containing the virus, cough and fever depart. They know which cells to attack because an infected cell is like a factory that produces and assembles bits and pieces of the virus. The waste that is left over the cell puts on the outside. The killer cells see them and moves in for the kill. In this way, each time the virus invades immunity expands.

Being immune can only ever mean that we do not fall seriously ill. The lymphocytes are more effective in removing the infection than antibodies as they concentrate more on putting out the fire than prevention. Many people will get infected but do not fall seriously ill because the fires are quickly extinguished. Some people may get ill because the balance between attack and defence is tipped in favour of the virus; normally the balance is restored and the victim recovers as the virus is overcome. As a general rule, only those with pre-existing conditions lose the battle. Coronavirus infections will therefore often be without symptoms and also why an epidemic with a new virus is never followed by a second and more serious wave.

This also why 85-90% of the SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals did not fall ill. The likelihood is that the lymphocytes put out the fires quickly and viral production was halted before it could get off the ground. Being a new variant, immunity was already widespread because of the presence of lymphocytes that cross-recognised the virus.

The question now arises as to whether a global vaccination is needed to end the coronavirus crisis. Vaccines have long been used in the fight against dreaded diseases. The development of vaccines against smallpox, diphtheria, tetanus and poliomyelitis have been celebrated as great turning points in the history of medicine. A vaccine is called for when an infection regularly leads to severe illness in generally healthy individuals. This is not the case with SARS-CoV-2. Mass vaccination is not appropriate when a large part of the population is already sufficiently protected against life-threatening disease, as is the case for SARS-CoV-2. A vaccine will fail when a virus co-existing worldwide with man and animals continually undergoes mutational change and when individuals are exposed to high doses of virus during the spread of the infection.

A global vaccination programme makes no sense. Risks far outweigh any possible benefits. Many around the world have expressed their concerns and warned of rushed COVID-19 vaccines with insufficient safety guarantees. The aim of most vaccines is to achieve high levels of neutralising antibodies against the binding spike proteins of the virus and cellular responses. A number of different strategies have been followed each with their own dangers. One example where things went tragically wrong was the oral polio vaccine used for decades until it was found that tragic outbreaks of polio in Africa were in fact being caused by the vaccine itself. Gene-based vaccines currently being explored have never received approval for human use. The present coronavirus vaccines have not undergone preclinical testing as is normally required by international regulations. It is safe to conclude that many of these vaccines are potentially dangerous.

The jubilation at the advent of yet another vaccine is marked by expressions such as ‘truly striking’ even ‘miraculous’ from Big Pharma cheerleaders. We need to be aware of what the pharma companies cannot tell us. They have no idea how long the protection of the COVID-19 vaccines will last. They have no data on how these jabs will affect children as school vie with each other to make vaccination mandatory. They also have little idea how the vaccine will work alongside other vaccines, nor do they have any idea what long-term side effects will emerge from the miracle vaccines. Remember all the Pharma companies have acquired assurances from the British government with respect to lawsuits. Headlines tout the effectiveness of vaccines as being 90-95% effective, but we are not told how in the trials a positive COVID-19 was defined. In the Pfizer trials it was sufficient to have a mild cough to qualify as positive and the Astra Zeneca trial allowed a mere cough and high temperature alongside a positive PCR test regardless of severity. None of the vaccines has been trialled to determine whether they can interrupt the transmission of the virus. The truth is that COVID-19 is still too rare and too benign to permit analysis of serious health outcomes. Vaccinating billions of people to prevent a disease with a 99% recovery rate in people under 70 often based on a trial efficacy analysis of less that 200 supposed cases involving patients and unreliable PCR test far from being a triumph of science, it is laughable. It smells of the usual pharma corruption and stinks to high heaven.

The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines such as those developed by Pfizer and Moderna are not classical vaccines. They will be the first ever messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines ever to be brought to the market for human patients. To receive approval, the companies will have to show that there are no immediate or short-term negative health effects. The problem is that as soon as the world starts inoculating itself with these new revolutionary vaccines, it will know nothing at all about their long-term effects. Said, Tal Brosh, head of the Infectious Disease Unit at Samson Assuta Ashdod Hospital, speaking to The Jerusalem Post, “There is a race to get the public vaccinated, so we are willing to take some risks.” The Independent wrote about the vaccine as Moderna was finishing its Phase I trial, “It uses a sequence of genetic material produced in a lab that, when injected into your body, must invade your cells and hijack your cells’ protein-making machinery called ribosomes to produce the viral components that subsequently train your immune system to fight the virus.”

Brosh said that this does not mean the vaccine changes people’s genetic code. Rather, he said it is more like a USB device (the mRNA) that is inserted into a computer (your body). It does not impact the hard drive of the computer but runs a certain program. But he acknowledged that there are unique and unknown risks to messenger RNA vaccines, including local and systemic inflammatory responses that could lead to autoimmune conditions.

Brosh compared the mRNA vaccine to traditional vaccines, such as those for influenza, which use an inactivated virus that was destroyed by heat or chemicals to elicit an immune response without infecting the recipient. Others, such as for measles or mumps, use a weakened virus that is unable to hurt you but can still train your immune system to fight it. Oxford University’s AstraZeneca, the Russian’s Sputnik V and the Israel Institute for Biological Research’s Brilife are all based on these more traditional technologies.

Many doctors are cautious in what they say when asked whether the new Covid vaccine is safe to take for many different reasons, including that of possibly losing their job. Is criticism of taking the vaccine a greater risk than the jab itself? The type of vaccine being developed against the virus has never – outside Ebola – ever been used before on humans. The trials have been extremely rushed and involved testing only small numbers. What could possibly go wrong? Indeed. The concerns of some doctors have less to do with the use of mRNA and more to do with the long-term efficacy of the vaccine, as well as other challenges that could cause something to go wrong and lead people to believe they are vaccinated when they are not. For example, because mRNA is so fragile, the Pfizer vaccine must be stored at negative 70 degrees Celsius. If the ideal environment is not maintained, the vaccine could “spoil” and become ineffective. In addition, several questions remain, such as whether these vaccines will really be able to mount a sufficiently protective immune response and how long that immunity would last. It would be the worst possible scenario if people behave like they are immune but can still become infected.

Peter Doshi, associate editor of the British Medical Journal and assistant professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy has said: “The world has bet the farm on vaccines as the solution to the pandemic, but the trials are not focused on answering the questions many might assume they are.”

What the mRNA will and will not do

The new Covid vaccines will make billions of dollars for the big pharmaceutical companies, but here’s what they won’t do:

1. The vaccines will not cure Covid
2. The vaccines will not prevent people from contracting Covid
3. The vaccines will not prevent Covid-related hospitalizations
4. The vaccines will not prevent Covid-caused deaths

If the vaccine does not protect from contracting Covid-19 or dying from it, then why should anyone take it? And the answer is: they shouldn’t. It makes no sense at all, especially in view of the fact that new vaccines pose considerable risks to one’s health and well-being. There are significant risks that the media and the medical establishment have papered-over with their ridiculous Happy Talk about “miracle” vaccines. But all of this is just public relations hype designed to hoodwink people into injecting themselves with a dubious substance that does NOT do what it’s supposed to do, and which DOES pose serious long-term risks to one’s health.

There are serious risks associated with taking the Covid-19 vaccine. Most vaccine recipients will experience only minor aches and pains but some will undoubtedly get quite ill and permanently damage their health. No one really knows for sure because there have been no long-term trials. The Covid vaccine has been fast-tracked from Day 1. So, the question is: Do the benefits outweigh the risks. And, in this case, they clearly don’t. The chances of getting violently sick or dying from Covid are very slight, (IFR is 1 in 400) while the (potential) adverse effects from the vaccine are spelled out above. Why would anyone roll the dice on a vaccine that does not prevent one from contracting Covid, does not protect one from hospitalization, and will not prevent one from dying? That’s just not a good tradeoff. Here’s more from an article at Forbes:
“Prevention of infection must be a critical endpoint…(But) Prevention of infection is not a criterion for success for any of these vaccines. In fact, their endpoints all require confirmed infections and all those they will include in the analysis for success, the only difference being the severity of symptoms between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Measuring differences amongst only those infected by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the implicit conclusion that the vaccines are not expected to prevent infection, only modify symptoms of those infected…”
“We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols…do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache.” (Covid-19 Vaccine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed”, Forbes)

Can you see what’s going on? “Prevention” is not even a primary objective. The standard for success in these trials is whether the vaccine mitigates Covid symptoms in people who test positive. But who cares about symptoms? What people care about is dying. That’s why people are so eager to get vaccinated, because they think it will eliminate the threat of dying.
This is a critical point, and one that is well worth mulling over, because it helps to illustrate how the vaccine campaign is built on a foundation of lies and deception. For example, when the drug companies boast that their product is “95% effective”, it does NOT mean that– if you get vaccinated– you will be immune to Covid. It doesn’t even mean that you won’t get violently ill and die. All it means is that the vaccine reduced the symptoms of some of the people in the trials who tested positive.
Most people are led to believe that if you take the vaccine, you’d be protected from CovidMost people equate vaccines with immunity. The drug companies know that which is why they’re exploiting people’s ignorance and deliberately obfuscating the truth. They want people to continue to believe that vaccination is a protective shield that will save them from sickness and death. This is completely untrue.
Here’s more from Forbes: “One of the more immediate questions a trial needs to answer is whether a vaccine prevents infection. If someone takes this vaccine, are they far less likely to become infected with the virus? These trials all clearly focus on eliminating symptoms of Covid-19, and not infections themselves….
It appears that all the pharmaceutical companies assume that the vaccine will never prevent infection. Their criteria for approval is the difference in symptoms between an infected control group and an infected vaccine group. …
A greater concern for the millions of older people and those with preexisting conditions is whether these trials test the vaccine’s ability to prevent severe illness and death. Again, we find that severe illness and death are only secondary objectives in these trials. None list the prevention of death and hospitalization as a critically important barrier….
These protocols do not emphasize the most important ramifications of Covid-19 that people are most interested in preventing: overall infection, hospitalization, and death. It boggles the mind and defies common sense that the National Institute of Health, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and the rest would consider the approval of a vaccine that would be distributed to hundreds of millions on such slender threads of success. It appears that these trials are intended to pass the lowest possible barrier of success.” (Covid-19 Vaccine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed, Forbes)

If the vaccine doesn’t prevent infection, it’s not worth taking. Period. And yet, all these high-falutin organizations are on-board with this farce. It’s a disgrace. We’re not even talking about a “low bar” for success here. We’re talking about “no bar”. If people are concerned about symptoms, they’d be better off taking an aspirin and leaving it at that. There’s no need to inject themselves with some hybrid cocktail that no one has the slightest idea of what the long-term effects might be. That’s just reckless.

Like we said earlier, the real issues are being cleverly concealed by the people in charge who are hyping the “95% effective” nonsense to hoodwink people into cooperating. It’s blatantly dishonest.
And here’s something else to think over: What do we really know about these miraculous vaccines that are supposed to lead us out of our “public health crisis”?

Not much. We know that they’re being rushed to market. We know that they were delayed for political reasons. We know the science is being shaped by the politics. We know that vaccine development typically takes 10 years, and that “rushed” vaccine development takes 3 years, and that the upcoming batch of dubious vaccines will have taken roughly 8 months.
“A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.”

Well, we’ve already shown that the new vaccines do not necessarily provide immunity, so the question is whether they actually “stimulate a person’s immune system” or if the “vaccine” moniker was simply preserved as a promotional device to dupe the public? The type of vaccine being developed against Covid-19 has never been used before, outside of Ebola. Some people feel that they should not really be called vaccines, because they are completely different from anything that has gone before.

Up to now, vaccination has meant injecting a dead virus (or bacteria), or one that has been weakened and can only poorly replicate, or parts of the virus, or suchlike. Once inside the body, the immune system spots this ‘alien’ material, and creates a response against it, which will hopefully be remembered for years and years. The next time the dangerous virus appears, the body will use the immune memory of something very similar, to wipe out the virus (or bacteria) at high speed, giving it no chance to do damage. Now, we have a thing called a messenger RNA vaccine (mRNA). RNA is, effectively, a single strand of DNA – the double helix that sits within our cells and makes up our genetic code. Many viruses are made up of a single strand of RNA, surrounded by a protein sphere. They enter the cell, take over the replication systems, make thousands of copies of themselves, then exit the cell. Sometimes killing the cell as they do so, sometimes exiting more gently. Covid19 (Sars-Cov2) is an RNA virus.

It’s all very complicated and cutting-edge, but what’s clear is that “Messenger RNA” and “spike’ protein” are a far-cry from plain-old dead virus which has worked just fine for decades. It’s hard to understand why the drug companies decided to reinvent the wheel in trying to settle on an antidote for Covid.

The renowned scientist, Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, has claimed the Covid-19 vaccine is ‘downright dangerous’ and will send you ‘to your doom’. Social distancing and the mask, he claims are backed up by zero science. These three things are being ‘pushed’ as a solution. His book Corona: False Alarm? is a massive best-seller available from Amazon. (Recommend it: much of the above information has been gleaned from this book). Dr Anthony Fauci has claimed that 75% of Americans would need to be vaccinated against Covid-19 in order to achieve herd immunity. Bhakdi described this as ‘utter nonsense’ and added ‘Someone who says this has not the slightest inkling of the basics of immunology.’ His verdict on the Covid-19 vaccine is ‘I think it’s downright dangerous. And I warn you, if you go along these lines, you are going to go to your doom’

Collusion of the Media

In a functioning democracy, we ought to expect that what is presented to the public by the media has some relation the truth. It should provide material for intelligent critique and discussion. It ought to operate apart from government in impartial autonomy. This has not been the case during the pandemic. All channels and newspapers have been little more than servile mouthpieces for government. Regard for the truth and human dignity disappeared.

From the outset fearmongering was the official strategy of governments to manage the perceived epidemic. It was essential to report excessively high numbers of deaths otherwise the situation would appear too trivial. A massive shock effect was needed. So it was that we were told Covid-19 was like slow drowning, excruciating slow suffocation. Then we were told that children were a dangerous source of infection who could unwittingly carry the deadly virus to parents and grandparents. Even though such dangers could not be shown to exist, the main thing was that people were frightened.

Disturbing scenes, frightening numbers filled our TV screens morning, noon and night. There no investigation of the warnings merely uncritical regurgitation. Fatalities were taken as read without mentioning the fact they were based not on reality but model calculations. Not mentioned was that the originator of these figures, Neil Ferguson, has a notorious reputation for wild inaccuracy in doom-laden predictions. Journalists questioning the Prime Minister at press conferences instead of holding him to account provided him with yet further occasion to air his false and misleading bilge. Marked by monotony, always the same ‘experts’ spouted their doubtful wisdom and advice, invariably appallingly negative. No dissenting voices were ever called upon. Indeed, they were held up to public ridicule. Immunologists and toxicologists early on pointed out that the seriousness or otherwise of SARS-CoV2 ought to be assessed in a similar way to common ‘flu viruses and that the measures implemented were completely exaggerated. All those with a sufficient and adequate knowledge of number theory taking time to study the date also came to the same conclusion. In fact, there was no scientific basis for these figures. Many took to YouTube to make their concerns known. Often their videos did not survive and were removed.

The old adage that there are lies, damn lies and statistics holds up in these circumstances. Figures are very useful in scaring the wits out of people. The infection rate was said to continuously and dangerously rising so that the NHS would not be able to cope. Left unsaid was that the number of those recovering was also steadily increasing, but this was kept from us. News reports showing images of the deceased told of a spiralling death rate. All supposedly died from COVID-19. However, we now know that a big fraction of these rather from the measures taken against COVID-19. Counting methods varied from country to country so that comparisons were almost impossible.

Critical voices were quickly slandered and defamed. Sadly, there are still those who believe because it appeared on BBC, it must be true. The numbers of such gullible unquestioning ‘believers’ is thankfully dwindling. The lying media is being seen for what it is.

The social media could have proved useful where critical opinions were being throttled in the mainstream. Many videos on YouTube promote hatred and lies, but are left untouched. Lots of videos that were critical of coronavirus measures disappeared like smoke in the night. Free speech is now more precious that it ever was. The policy of YouTube has been expressed by CEO, Susan Wojcicki: “Everything that violates the recommendations of the WHO would constitute a breach against our guidelines. Therefore, deletion is another important part of our guidelines.” It was the WHO that vastly overestimated the fake swine ‘flu in 2009 and has now driven the world into a crisis with its COVID-19 misjudgements.

The world-renowned virologist Professor John Oxford: “Personally, I would say the best advice is to spend less time watching TV news which is sensational and not very good. Personally, I view this COVID outbreak as akin to a bad winter influenza epidemic. We are suffering from a media epidemic!”

It is nothing if not naїve to assume that science is not just as corrupt as politics. The EU made 10 million euros available to research coronavirus. Anyone who thought they would like to research this virus was eligible to apply for financing. The result has been an end stream of fairly useless information which is not helpful to those pointing out the relative harmlessness of the virus.

Our hard-earned cash is being redistributed to the pharmaceutical industry meanwhile livelihoods are being destroyed, fundamental rights trampled on, freedom of speech, assembly, movement, relocation, worship, to work and make a living.

We have a media-fuelled mass hysteria, arbitrary political decisions, extensive restrictions of fundamental rights, freedom of expression stamped on by police, enforced conformity on the media, denunciation and defamation of dissidents and to crown it all dangerous human experiments. When mainstream media and politicians agree to support each other then it is about things that are not good but evil.

The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was never an epidemic worthy of national concern and the implementation of exceptional measures and laws. Already by mid-April 2020, it was clear that the epidemic was coming to an end and that the measures undertaken against it were causing widespread havoc and suffering and considerable collateral damage. Despite this governments are content to trample on fundamental rights in a destructive crusade against a spook virus. Our heritage and culture are being wilfully destroyed before our eyes, shall we then do nothing?

Conclusion

What is currently going on in our country and across much of the western world is a public health crisis that was manufactured and been used to short-circuit long-held civil liberties, strengthen the authority of political leaders, collapse the economy, dramatically remake basic social relations, and impose absolute control over work, school, gatherings and recreational activities. Public policy is now set by unelected technocrats who operate behind the cover of lofty-sounding organizations that are entirely controlled by the world’s biggest corporations and richest oligarchs.

The question remains as to whether the hullabaloo surrounding the Coronavirus emerged as a spontaneous and appropriate reaction to a lethal and fast-spreading pandemic or whether the hysteria has been greatly exaggerated (Infection Fatality Rate is 0.26% or 1 in 400) to implement a transformational political-social agenda that will not only eradicate democracy and basic human rights, but also pave the way for dangerous vaccines that will dramatically curtail population growth, which is an objective that is widely shared among wealthy elites.
Unfortunately, the media is owned lock, stock and barrel by the same people who create crises to advance their own self-serving agenda. Covid-19 is probably no different in that regard. The fact that the infection is modestly lethal actually helps to achieve the broader goal of reshaping society, restructuring the economy, abandoning representative government, and reducing the population to more sustainable levels. These are the real objectives of this politically-driven farce. More than 11,000 experts from around the world are calling for a critical addition to the main strategy of dumping fossil fuels for renewable energy: there needs to be far fewer humans on the planet…“We declare, with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from around the world, clearly and unequivocally that planet Earth is facing a climate emergency,” the scientists wrote in a stark warning. (Earth Needs Fewer People, Scientists Say Bloomberg)

The fact is, there is a growing consensus among corporate leaders and other elites that we are facing a “climate emergency” that will require immediate and draconian changes to our political, social and economic structures. Is it too far-fetched to think that Covid-19 was conjured up in order implement those changes without revealing the real reason? After all, the public is pretty evenly-split on climate change which means that the opposition would likely be organized, well-funded and ferocious. No doubt, that is something the oligarchs wanted to avoid altogether. A greatly-exaggerated global pandemic was the much better choice. With the media already in tow, and enough sell-out public health experts and Democrat governors to do the heavy-lifting, the prospects for success must have looked quite promising.

The teams of psychologists who worked with governments (to sell the Covid terror) and who figured out that mundane reality must be turned on its head– through social distancing, masks, shelter-in-place orders, the closing of schools, businesses, public gatherings, and religious services– in order (to create a disorienting and terrifying environment) to usher in a new authoritarian system in which personal freedom extends no further than selecting one’s online purchases from either Costco or Amazon. These psychologists deserve much of the credit for the transformation of the western world into a lockdown police state ruled by scheming miscreants who will now decide our future for us.

Vaccine distribution is being rushed due to the fact that the pandemic is winding down, in fact, for all practical purposes, it’s already over. In the US, the hospitalization and fatality data are being deliberately inflated to perpetuate the hysteria, (we’ll explain this later) while in the UK, the fatalities attributable to Covid (in the fake “Second Wave”) have never exceeded the 5-year average of “excess deaths”, which is the barometer for deciding whether there is an unusual spike in mortality or not. There isn’t. The Second Wave does not exist. It is pure fabrication. Check out this blurb from Dr. Mike Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory. Yeadon dismisses the “Second Wave” theory as unscientific nonsense.

Here’s what he says:
“Viruses don’t do waves… I have repeatedly asked to see the trove of scientific papers used to predict a ‘second wave’ and to build a model to compute its likely size and timing. They have never been forthcoming. It’s almost as if there is no such foundational literature… There have been no examples of multiple waves since and the most recent novel coronavirus with any real spread (SARS) performed one wave each in each geographical region affected. Why a model with a ‘second wave’ in it was even built, I cannot guess. …
Despite the absence of any evidence for a ‘second wave’ – and the evidence of absence of waves for this class of respiratory virus – there was an across-the-board, multi-media platform campaign designed to plant the idea of a ‘second wave’ in the minds of everyone. This ran continually for many weeks. It was successful: a poll of GPs showed almost 86% of them stated that they expected a ‘second wave’ this winter.

As research for this piece, I sought the earliest mention of a ‘second wave’. Profs Heneghan and Jefferson, on Apr 30th, noted that we were being warned to expect a ‘second wave’ and that the PM had, on Apr 27th, warned of a ‘second wave’. The Professors cautioned anyone making confident predictions of a ‘second’ and ‘third wave’ that the historical record doesn’t provide support so to do.

I looked for mentions by the BBC of a ‘second wave’.. On Mar 3rd and 6th, there is mention of a single SARS-CoV-2 wave with most (95%) of the impact early on. What looks to be the final document, Mar 29th, still just refers to one wave. This is what history and immunology teaches….

Despite this bothersome oddity about a ‘second wave’ and almost as if there was a plan for one, the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) testing infrastructure in the UK began to be reshaped….the Portuguese high court determined two weeks ago that this PCR test is not a reliable way to determine the health status or infectiousness of citizens…. With the scientific validity of this test under severe challenges, I believe it must immediately be withdrawn from use.” (The PCR False Positive Pseudo-Epidemic, Lockdown Skeptics)

There was no second wave, only a plan for one, which is to say, there was a plan for amplifying the panic to achieve the objectives.
Yeadon then explains how the PCR tests were removed from NHS (National Health Service) labs and delivered to privately-owned “mass testing centers” that replaced “highly qualified and experienced Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) registered biomedical scientists” with ” mainly by volunteer unregistered staff in unaccredited laboratories that have been established within a few weeks.” Naturally, this threw into question the overall reliability of their test results which, in turn, produced massive numbers of false positives that in no way reflected the diminishing impact of the virus.
As Yeadon’s states: such mass testing brings with it, when using PCR as the method, a severe risk of what we call a “PCR false positive pseudo-epidemic”. This could never happen if we were not using PCR mass testing. When a more reliable test was used in Liverpool (Lateral-flow test or LFT) showing that a smaller percentage of people were infected, the test was discarded in favor of the PCR test.

“By September, the great bulk of PCR testing was being run by large, private labs, some of which are called Lighthouse Labs.” That is when the number of infections began to spike sharply which was completely inconsistent with the behaviour of epidemics in the past.

Yeadon: “How we can square these claims of tens of thousands of daily “cases” and an unprecedented ‘second wave’ of deaths with the unfeasible quantity of testing using a technique considered by bench experts difficult to perform reliably even on a small scale?”
That’s easy. The whole charade was rigged to make PCR false positives look like a real epidemic. Keep in mind, this isn’t my unprofessional observation, but Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory.

And just look at the extent to which this farce was maintained. Here’s Yeadon explaining how definitions are stretched to the breaking point to exaggerate the number of Covid fatalities:
“A “case” is a positive PCR test. No symptoms are involved. A “COVID-19 admission” to a hospital is a person testing positive by PCR before, on entry or at any time during a hospital stay, no matter the reason for the admission or the symptoms the patient is presenting. A “COVID-19 death” is any death within 28 days of a positive PCR test.”
So, let’s say you have a massive heart attack and die, but a PCR test shows you have harmless RNA fragments in your bloodstream, then the death is labeled “Covid”. Got that? Yeadon summarizes this hanky-panky in one terse sentence:
“We have very strong evidence that the PCR mass testing as currently conducted is completely worthless.” (Yeadon and a panel of experts have since submitted a 10-point paper to the Eurosurveillance editorial board challenging the science upon which the PCR test is based “which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19. We are confronted with stringent lockdowns which have destroyed many people’s lives and livelihoods, limited access to education and these imposed restrictions by governments around the world are a direct attack on people’s basic rights and their personal freedoms, resulting in collateral damage for entire economies on a global scale.”)

According to Yeadon and his team of independent researchers:
“The pandemic was over by June and herd immunity was the main force which turned the pandemic and pressed it into retreat. In the autumn, the claimed “cases” are an artefact of a deranged testing system…. While there is some COVID-19 along the lines of the “secondary ripple” …it has occurred primarily in regions, cities and districts that were less hard hit in the spring. Real COVID-19 is self-limiting and may already have peaked in some Northern towns. It will not return in force…

That’s it. All the rest is a PCR false positive pseudo-epidemic. The cure, of course, as it has been in the past when PCR has replaced the pandemic itself as the menace in the land, is to stop PCR mass testing.” (The PCR False Positive Pseudo-Epidemic, Dr Mike Yeadon, Lockdown Skeptics)

Fake testing results, manipulated mortality data, relentless deception and disorienting state mandates (masks, lockdown etc) have fuelled public hysteria creating the compliant population our rulers seek. After 8 months of this psychic-drubbing, the elites are now ready to deliver the coup de grâce, a vaccine containing potentially-toxic substance that will change the course of history.

So, one should be extremely wary of vaccines that are rushed to market in record time, just as they should be suspicious of the motives of people who see “skepticism” or “hesitancy” as a “national security threat”. These people are not to be trusted. It’s that simple.

Why, for example, would the British government enlist “military intelligence to seek out and stamp out what The Times calls “anti-vaccine militants” and related “propaganda content” in cyberspace”? Why would the social media giants remove articles that are critical of the vaccines? Why are all the media and public health experts pushing for mass vaccination?

Maybe it’s climate change, maybe it’s over-population, or maybe it’s a collective determination to transform society into a technocratic dystopia. (“The Great Reset”). We don’t really know, but one thing is certain, all this ballyhoo about Covid is a red herring. It simply diverts attention from the real agenda, which is why we should be cautious about the vaccines.
There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic…. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects……
Since it is demonstrable that “around 30% of the population had prior immunity,” and if one includes some young children who are “resistant,” 40%, and while considering that the infection rate is “somewhere [in] the mid-20s to low-30s per cent,” this means that around 65 to 72% of the population currently has immunity to COVID-19. And considering the reality of herd immunity, when susceptibility to a virus falls this low, at around 28 to 35%, “that population can no longer support an expanding outbreak of disease,” and thus the virus “wanes and disappears... The pandemic is effectively over and can easily be handled by a properly functioning NHS (National Health Service). Accordingly, the country should immediately be permitted to get back to normal life.

1. The new messenger RNA vaccines could make recipients more susceptible to serious illness or death.
2. Spike proteins can “trigger an immune reaction” that will “result in infertility.” (Once again, Population control)
3. The new vaccines contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) which can be “potentially fatal.”
4. The trials were not long enough to determine whether the vaccines are safe or not.
5. The new regime of Covid-19 vaccines is both unnecessary and risky. Readers should ignore the hype and do their own research. Take responsibility for your own health and welfare. Do not expect the media or public health officials to tell the truth. They won’t. They want to use you as a guinea pig in their deranged lab experiment. Do not cooperate, do not comply, do not acquiesce, do not give in.

APPENDIX

Open Letter From: UK Medical Freedom Alliance To: The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) To: The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) Cc: Matt Hancock (Secretary of State for Health and Social Care) Re: Advertisement, Offer and Administration of Vaccines for COVID-19 in the UK Sent by Email on 23 November 2020 To All Concerned: CONCERNS AND SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THE UK’S COVID-19 VACCINE AGENDA:

We are an alliance of medical practitioners, scientists, academics and lawyers who are concerned about the current climate surrounding the impending use of a possible vaccine (“a Covid Vaccine”) that may be advertised, offered and administered among the general public in response to the recent pandemic that has been attributed to a virus called SARSCoV-2, which we are told causes the symptoms of a disease called COVID-19. In this letter we outline our concerns and highlight some of the potential negative outcomes that could arise if these concerns are not taken seriously. We also offer some suggestions for your consideration. These practical suggestions may help avert, or alleviate, some of the negative impacts that are likely to result if no action is taken and the current vaccine agenda continues unchecked. Our Concerns about a Covid Vaccine, at the present time (and subject to additions or amendments as the situation progresses) fall into the following four areas: I) Over-Estimation of the Public Health Risk from SARS-CoV-2 II) Inadequate Assessment of the Public Health Risk from a Covid Vaccine III) Medical Freedom and Informed Consent IV) Media Claims and Misinformation These are explained in detail below. I) Over-Estimation of the Public Health Risk from SARS-CoV-2 Concerning epidemiological indicators for assessment of risk: (1) When the “novel” coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 was initially discovered in China in late 2019, we were told that not a lot was known about this virus and it was necessary to take urgent steps to protect the public at large. The steps included, inter alia, 2 of 14 lockdowns and social distancing. Whether those steps were reasonable or necessary back in March is outside the scope of this letter and our position is reserved as to these steps. (2) Nevertheless, when determining that a virus is so deadly as to justify a rushed rollout of a vaccine intended for use by an entire population, one must consider what is meant by ‘deadly.’ We must consider the proportion of the general public who are likely to die, or to suffer serious illness from the effects of that virus. At the outset of the current crisis, real data were not available, and the Government relied, amongst others, on the mathematical modelling of Imperial College London, led by Professor Neil Ferguson (the Fergusson Model), to drive its coronavirus response. This response includes the current drive for a quick rollout of a Covid Vaccine, which is intended for the entire population of the UK. (3) We now have ample real data, including the Case Fatality Rates (CFR) and Infection Fatality Rates (IFR) that are attributed to various age groups. Most importantly, we have the data to show excess deaths from all causes. Excess deaths is an ideal measure of the effect of a pandemic virus in a population because, as is the case with SARS-CoV2, where the vast majority of deaths attributed to this virus or the disease COVID-19 could also have been attributed to comorbidities such as heart disease, COPD, cancer, etc., we can clearly see whether the overall death rate in the population is significantly above what one would expect in the year 2020 based on prior estimates, had those people died from their underlying illnesses. (4) The Office of National Statistics (ONS) is considered the ‘Gold Standard’ for data and statistics in the UK. Using mortality statistics as the benchmark, the data from the ONS website suggest that there are no longer any significant excess deaths above a 5-year average.1 From this, and for the purposes of the UK Government’s Covid Vaccine agenda, we may conclude that any serious public health risk from SARS-CoV-2 is over. (5) The latest estimate of average population IFR for SARS-CoV-2 is 0.23%,2

D. William Norris

_______________________________________________

 

"Once to every man and nation comes the moment to decide,

In the strife of Truth with Falsehood, for the good or evil side ..."

James Russell Lowell